LeTransmuteur.Net

Designate one who has respiratory failure of the economy by the image of a "bursting bubble" was a great idea.

Complex systems are defined by the fact that between the input and output, which is what we can do and the effects obtained, the link of cause and effect through the meanders such that the result is not directly predictable . Not only this link is not direct, but also because multiple conditions the same cause may have different effects depending on timing.
Hence we can say that a "fair" in the ideal is one in which, to achieve positive results, one must first grasp the ethical and moral rules and apply them properly.

Technology of natural reflex is to detect an approximate but tending towards improving the cause or causes must cause it to get the desired effects. This mechanism is completely independent of moral or ethical factors.

When you live in a complex system such as is today's economy, the pinnacle of intelligence to get by is to understand what it takes to raise the most money to to be safe. Besides the poor themselves welcome the rich believer in the superior intelligence, where in fact they would if they were not ignore ethics.

Besides, it is unfortunate that the term safety is not generally understood in this sense, because the main cause of insecurity in the world is precisely the injustice of a system whose inputs are too far from the moral if you want to get in return a positive result in output of cause-effect chain.

In life there are two kinds of people (gag), those who are too honest and remain poor and those who insist on exercising their intelligence to their security, considering that the property obtained under a moral character in their actions.

Those who want to make money know very well how to do it, while most of the mass of people, though they would want, whenever are blocked by an excess of moral constraints, such as making primarily a fun job. If we pollute, contaminate it, if one is careless and degenerate, were much more likely to be "safe" within the system unfair. This is what makes its injustice.

° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °

The attacks of 9/11 in the U.S. permanently injured and traumatized this country. It has been triggered from inside or outside, that is the question that everyone asks, does not matter actually, because ultimately what matters most is the chain of consequences which was triggered : worldwide every self-proclaimed democratic countries have felt unsafe, and have strengthened their tendency toward dictatorship in preparation for possible accidents e kind, such as trauma to the lower bounding slamming a door (which is a powerful spring which can rely cogitating those who really immoral acts).

The trauma is that the truth about the root cause was never elucidated. Until we know not why or what was intended, we remain in a sense of injury and pain.
Normally pragmatism is to retain only what exists to define the desired goals, assuming that the implementation was carefully designed so that the desired effects are those actually obtained.

But even these remain vague, one tends to think in terms of new world order of global dictatorship, reduction of world population in order to save the system unfair, as the set of assumptions most likely view the kind of intelligence that is generally entitled to expect from the leaders. This is an intelligence based solely on conditioned reflexes by the practice in the unjust system, they just know "how" (the money), independently of all other issues. They are forced to undergo training in high schools, to know "how". (This is supposed to predict the kind of absurdity of a world where the "how" is not accessible to the being endowed with reason alone.)

° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °

Morning in a vision I saw a bubble burst. If-if! I wondered how the soap was going to stick to plug the hole from which the straw swells. In fact it is pulling on it, it creates a tunnel that the movement can be crushed and paste, after which the bubble is completely independent of the external environment and stabilizes. I had the vision of this bubble in the process of stabilizing when I said that once sealed, the amount of air inside the bubble was set, and the fluctuating pressure.

This pressure fluctuation of a fixed amount of air meets an algorithmic law which I discovered in 2004 that the algorithm is the number Phi, which allows for this irrational number from a rational calculation, by means of a back and forth from mechanical continually diminishing, the computer calculates a a matter of seconds.
This is the image of homeostasis in any system homeostasis takes place and all the objects that contribute to a system meets the highest priority to the overall system's need to find a balance.

For example, here is an unfair system that produces the effect that within it is immorality that achieves an "output" favorable, ie that it is injustice that allows 'come out ahead, I named "poker"!
In this game "play beautifully smarter" is to bluff his opponents in the most efficient and invisible as possible. If, for ethics, we never bluffs, even knowing full well guess the other players' cards, while his initial bet does not only decrease very gradually but surely towards complete bankruptcy. For even when one has the winning cards in hand, and especially at this time, there is always a player to claim to have better maps, what one is tempted not to give (by desire to do justice!). But bluffing is systematic, it happens as often as not is not one. The best poker player, may take the "word" on behalf of the whole group at the sight of a draw, for example saying "this draw is rotten, I do not bet much." Everyone is okay, everyone put as much, so that the good and bad cards are impossible to detect. At that time it's a groupthink that is, and one who spoke the tone. But comes the bluffer, who said "no draw for me is wonderful, I put everything! ". Then the one who spoke may be revealing in fact he wanted to bluff everyone, either fold and lose his bet, thinking that the bluffer opposite actually a good game after which the other players fold or resistant according to their game in poker if you act ethically and gullible, we lose. And obviously when a player makes a "carpet" every time, one suspects he's bluffing in an arrogant way, we see that it breaks all the groupthink, and the worst in all this is that wins is the initial bet or the total bet, in short he usually wins. In the finals once a player has "carpet" from the start without even looking at his cards. The other players, stunned, found themselves in a combat situation against immorality, in which they have more chance of losing that many are struggling.

This is very useful to study poker as a complex system whose resultant depends on factors over which no one has any control (since in this case it is by happenstance).
In a real complex system, the laws are so numerous and contradictory that the result is also very close to random.
Besides it is really "by chance" that the rich are rich, the poor are poor, and that the powerful and powerless are in place that is "theirs" (which is not the case in a system compassionate).
And as in poker, which is struggling in an unjust system, it is more powerful (in terms of wealth) were more likely to bankrupt the other players.
In fact any victory hangs on the psychological pressure they can exert on others, such as cynical sadists.
And if all players agree great, and seek purity in the game is still clever and pragmatic, without any of them make interference by being arrogant, then we observe that the gains each players are balanced more.

Within an unjust system, it is injustice that can escape it is also how we define the reality of this injustice.

° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °

The global economic system is a bubble, in which air is blown to turn up the heat. Within this system there are multiple sub-bubbles that make air exchange and vary their mutual pressure. Normally these exchanges should be done within a closed system in which only the trading results in the variation of pressure, so that the overall amount of air is constant and only the pressure is fluctuating.
In this case, it is a system governed by gold, which is a limited amount to which we assign a variable value. If there is any gold in 1000 in the world, then the value of everything must accommodate the values ​​of all other things to balance.
This system seems holier than the system is constantly injecting money and the value of all things, so, only increases, but never really able to get one, so some bubbles begin to inflate disproportionately to the reality which it balances is the result. The day we realizes that bubble burst and the air that's inside is fed back to the bubbles connected to the first.

But this system in global fixed amount of air is only a symbolic image of reality that must be produced by a fair system. In reality we must laugh, and be free to vary the overall quantity, so it regulates itself freely of herself.
What matters most is the principle that the value of all things do that because of the calibrated value of all the other things.
Within a system "less unjust" (say) it will took care to establish the relationship between values, so as to give an outline that should not be crossed. It should beings proportional laws and coarse, such as "energy should not exceed 5% of overall expenditure", "food must be sufficient Everywhere," "a manufactured product should not be more than ten times more than the gross proceeds ", etc. ...

In fact it is a real-time algorithm which is to say, starting from a fixed point as "a loaf of bread = 1", how should calibrate all other prices around the first mark as a rule imposed. And costs making up the "baguette" price should be lower than "1", and other prices should be similar to the first fixed value, say for example "a pain au chocolat = 1 also, knowing that he can decently argue "2".
This would be a first for abstract rule that prices are put up against each other, either globally throughout the global financial system. An algorithm must complete this task and produce a real-time prices at the time of the Acqusition of any goods.
I do not know if the reader assumes all the mechanics there must be behind this result to allow a comfortable ease and safety. But it is urgent and vital need to go in search of the system that produced this result.

° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °

In fact, when an event is about to occur, it is a power that has condensed in an accumulator and is stuck there. It's a bit like the trauma, it is an available energy that has not been spent and can not be in the presence of a reason. Sometimes (even often) in a system of high energy density, the slightest event can become the catalyst for a sum of events that were ready to pounce.
This is the case in disharmonious couples who jump on the slightest excuse to strangle each other, this is the case in the chambers where politicians, in the guise of a peaceful reason an argument triggers fire to the powder as to say "ç'en too! "And as is the case when an economic bubble (stuck in an illusion) suddenly has contact with reality.

This is why the real good economists say that eventually, the entire global economic system is a bubble about to burst. It does not address the sub-bubbles and transfer the amount of air from one point to one other, even the sphere of ultra-rich of this world (which is experiencing rapid inflation, should specify) is a bubble that will burst them very badly, the day will be considered such as gold in which they take refuge "for safety" is of no value to the human system. This is largely predictable.

Mechanisms of nature, which are certainly homeostatic, can leave the hope that at any unjust system is self-destroyed through his own fault, releasing a large amount of condensed energy (oppressed) that immediately it has found a way to coordinate, and thus "a reason".

8119

(Source: http://w41k.info/?read=28308 )

This article was published Sunday, June 14, 2009 at 9:19 in: Anthropology , Economics , Ideas , Politics , Sociology . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed . You can make a comment or trackback from your own site.