"What came first: the chicken or the egg? " 
Posted by LeTransmuteur in: Paradox , Science & Technology 
So here's the solution: Based on the fact that genetic material does not change during the life of a living organism evolved, we conclude that the first bird to become a hen's necessarily begin as an embryo (first exist as an embryo) inside of an egg, a prerequisite for the transfer. No bird could become a hen after her birth. This is the Egg the first!
"The first chicken had to come out of an egg laid by another species. But it was a hen's egg since it contained a chick embryo. "
John Brookfield of the University of Nottingham, a specialist in evolutionary genetics.
Objection: If I say that an egg is laid by a hen ... This is a paradox as already stated, and therefore there is no answer: to get an egg, there was a chicken and have a hen, there was an egg.
Response to the objection: No, where did the Chicken? The hen does not exist since time immemorial, a species of bird has mutated and become a hen. The bird that laid the egg is not necessarily a hen! Hen called an animal with a genetic program equivalent to the current chickens!
"We can conclude without doubt that the first living matter member of the species must be the egg. The egg was necessarily before the chicken. "
David Papineau, a philosopher of science at King's College London.
The question can be translated as: When was the change? From one generation to another? Or during the same generation? Do you understand?
Conclusion: Indeed, if we take a genetic program constant, this paradox leads to an absurdity. But if you consider everything as a simple assembly of particles (atoms, molecules, ...) then it is our view that any change, there is no continuity in any more things and items that could have qualified as "massive" scale of an atom (for example) are then an aggregation of small particles. This aggregate changes over time according to specific rules of physics, it will "grow" or separate at different times.
The paradox of the egg and the hen does not arise any more!
"What's n'œuf, baby? "
~ Albert Einstein
February 30, Albert Einstein discovered that the egg or the chicken came first. His theory, that the hen is probably arrive before the egg, however, is challenged by the vast majority of scientists who think that the egg is probably happened before.
It is high time to resolve this paradox. It is the survival of bird flu. Anyway, the only real question to ask is how beings as large and powerful that dinosaurs may have evolved to become an animal as ridiculous a chicken? This issue is close to that of the amazing evolution of vampires in mosquitoes.
Thesis number one: The chicken before the egg
The first assumption is made that an unknown quantity. Some say it's your mother, but it is wiser to regard this as pure speculation.
Experience
To show the world that he had not shamefully misled, Igor Bogdanov developed an experiment that could challenge the opposing theory. For this, he reasoned by contradiction. If the egg had come before the chicken, then chicken emanates from an egg. The experiment consisted therefore it was impossible to prove that a hen goes into an egg. The first experiment was conclusive, Igor published the results of its work. Unfortunately for him, the scientific community Recusa experience, claiming that the chicken at birth does not have feathers. The scientist repeated, but this time he plucked the animal, and fair play went so far as the reverse. The result was convincing: the egg could not arrive before the chicken.
Obviously, Mr. Bogdanoff was never taken seriously when he came, he said, to solve this problem is a vicious circle.
Physical Evidence
The archaeological site of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines was discovered the fossil of the first egg box, past the ruins of the first "Shopi" of the world. But the carbon-14 dating site dating to 1957. We know that chickens existed at least in 1920 (my grandmother told me).
Thesis number tou: The egg before the chicken
This thesis is most supported by the scientific community, we will not dwell on the details.
Experience
If the egg came before the chicken is that it's not a goose that laid this egg. It is from this principle that Descartes created his experience. He sought first if it was possible that another animal Ponde an egg. The experiment was as follows. We took the animal to be tested and he inserted an egg into the anus. Then we waited until the egg comes out. If the egg broke the insertion or ejection, the animal was invalidated. After hundreds of failed experiments, Rene Descartes died during the experiment on the giant crocodile. All supporters of this theory then thought she would never be proven. It was not until 1980 that Robert Dugland successfully locates the animal corresponding to the first criterion. It was actually his wife, Ginette Dugland.
The consequences
Based on this assumption, we arrive at the following scheme: the chicken down Ginette Dugland, born Plantieu.
"Ah bah here then! It pierces my ass! "
~ Ginette Dugland about the discovery of his relationship with a famous kind of fowl.
Conclusion creationist
* On the first day, there was nothing.
* On the second day, there was the earth.
* On the third day, there were the animals, including the chicken that was contained in an egg.
Here, why do shit to think while religious dogmas explain everything!
Fuck!
Thesis thri number (post-conclusion): No one is chicken!
As science continues to evolve, there will never be a final conclusion. And that's another mystery of science: "How do we know when to stop with the arguments, to synthesize and publish a conclusion? ".
The third theory is supported by evolutionary theory and genetics. According to this theory the chickens and eggs are just illusions! There is no (there has never been and never would have been!) Or chicken or egg. And things do not exist, the question of "who comes before who" does not arise (the theory of logic). At first, there is nothing. Then a "Big Bang" (the mysterious source) and it is the galaxy and then it is our land and then bah that's life (created by a mysterious source, may be the same as the "Big Bang" !). So life at first it was single-celled microbes. Bah and these little things are changing (they said it must evolve!? A mysterious source too! May be the same as the first two!). Finally it continues to evolve until reaching widgets multicellular. At some point, they lay eggs stuff, but they were not at all what is known and called "chickens", except they made the lay eggs. But with this resemblance minor, you can call them at almost doting 0.0000000001%. Thereafter, it is still evolving in some way and almost doting improve their percentage of similarity. But never a hen reaches the 100% because no hen looks exactly like one another made. So to conclude this thesis, no one is chicken and chicken is no one. Voila!
I think it is useless to go to the atom and elementary particles to resolve the paradox ...
Genetics and Darwin are enough.
The DNA of the chicken is in the egg, the DNA of the cock is also present after fertilization.
And after the crossover, there is a new DNA, combining the two previous and introducing possible mutations.
The egg hatched chick to the (hen or rooster) is no longer the same as the hen has laid eggs. Will remain alive as the chick mutation carrier non-lethal, non-sterilizing, adapted to its environment.
The paradox of language is therefore the one hand that means two different eggs with the same word and speaks only of chicken for the individual and the species, without introducing the cock! This paradox is worthy of the Almanach Vermot is a pun.
@ JeanNimes
So confirmation: the paradox of the "chicken and egg" should not ask!
The universe, as understood, is not from eternity ... This raises the problem of being the first (or first chicken) which was not caused by another being.
"The chicken or the egg" is a roundabout way to exploit the dilemma of the origin of life ... a spontaneous generation is needed and yet we have never observed. Whether this generation, at the time of its appearance, was mature enough / developed to give birth in the wake, it's just a detail, I think.
To understand the problem of the egg and the chicken, we must ask that the prior KINGDOM IS ALL IN THE UNIVERSE.
There is nothing that is separate and is an absolute law.
Based on this we can assume, according to the new vision that emanates from the latest findings on the creation of the world you can discover for the first time in the ebook "GOD" :
- That the universe is harmonious hierarchical manner by his intelligence and his energy.
- Thinking that the spawned the pure EMPTY.
The vacuum created has evolved the BLACK HOLES.
Black holes have led the advanced STAR.
The stars have evolved which produced the PLANETS EARTH.
The land has led the advanced MICROBES.
Microbes have evolved generated PLANTS.
Plants have spawned the advanced ANIMALS.
And higher animals are born MEN ...
All this in detail that one has this little book to my knowledge, previously unpublished images in support ... a revelation!
To return to our subject, it appears from this that the first animals, including roosters and hens, were born of the mutation of fruit, vegetable DNA evolved, plants evolved in "egg" in animal DNA pre ...
(Confirmed by observation of cell biology as animal cells from plant cell-Advanced)
CONCLUSION: the first animals come from a range of fruit plants that have evolved naturally mutated into "eggs" animal ...
Fruits and vegetables have evolved animals given the first eggs by natural evolution ...
Roosters and hens parties making the animal kingdom, it is clear they come from an egg of an animal that has preceded their species ...
The debate is over!
Fortunately,
God thank you ...
Actually this is a prominent scientific problem, a philosophical conundrum that may summarize the limits of the dialectic.
To meet all the understanding, most end up breaking the egg by making an omelette, cook chicken and make a banquet in honor of a problem does not arise.
This recalls the story given to Christopher Columbus: to hold an egg on its point: Columbus broke the egg and that was the end of the meso-American civilizations except in dreams ... and some of the colonizers in their recalcitrant Indian tribes origin are reincarnated in the skins of the children of those who invaded them ...
The second form of consciousness conceives the chicken and the egg as a hologram time, seamless and press the archetype, no need to cook the two events!
The chicken and egg are the cover and cook for reconciling two dialecticians, I hope that those reading have understood if it is cooked.
Bon appetit.