Archive for the 'New World Order "

http://nous-les-dieux.org/VIDEOS/declassification.flv declassification (7:22)

Kidas

Author: Direct Killer Album: Kidas

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 13 comments »

W Joseph Stroupe by

"Pay attention to the wishes you express, they might come true! "This saying applies perfectly to the Federal Reserve of the United States, while it is entering what may prove to be an entirely new phase and most dangerous financial and economic crisis that still focuses on states United - despite the ongoing stock market rally on Wall Street and growing hopes that the worst is now behind us.

crise-du-dollar The Fed wanted hysterical aversion of global investors for the risk did not exist, which dislike culminated in the fall of 2008, when major Wall Street banks collapsed, sending tremors across the globe . After all, the position of the FED is responsible for this crisis was largely triggered by investors in a panic, which have artificially caused the value of financial innovators in American well below their real value, throwing unfairly discredit on massive amounts of such assets, by labeling them "toxic"!

The Fed has felt able to breathe new life into these assets and the U.S. economy based on asset bubbles, and reopening the floodgates of credit and replacing fear with the confidence of investors - which inevitably leads a bigger appetite for risk. Some risk appetite is now back. But the problem is that the U.S. dollar did not benefit. Instead, his injuries are only reopen.

As of 2 June, the dollar reached its nadir in 2009 again against almost all major currencies, dropping, just that day, a large percent against the euro, by completely ignoring the statement of the Secretary Treasury, Tim Geithner, during his visit to China that the U.S. favored a strong dollar. May 27, the yield curve for Treasury bills rose to new heights, while the difference between good two-year and ten years reached 2.75%, 2.78% even verging on 2 June

Global investors, both private and public (central banks), stronger than ever express their growing fears of exposure to the dollar beyond the short term. They also share the collapse of confidence in that currency as a store safe, beyond the short term. Read the rest of this article ... "

Tags , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

By Mike Whitney

Is it possible to make hundreds of billions of dollars in profits on securities that are backed by nothing but virtual inputs in a book loan?

les-perils-de-la-titrisation This is not only possible it was done. And now the scoundrels who cashed in on these scams have been queuing outside the building of the Federal Reserve to exchange their shares against rotten billions of dollars of loans financed by taxpayers. Meanwhile, the credit crunch has left the financial system in ruins and planted the economy as a tent stake. The unemployment lines are growing and consumers reduce their budget on everything from nights on the town to travel to the grocery store. And all this is due to the financial pyramid scam concocted on Wall Street, which has spread across the entire global system as an aggressive flu epidemic. This is not a normal recession, the financial system blew up because of the greedy bankers who have used "financial innovation" to cripple the system and have swelled the biggest bubble of all time. And they did it legally, using a little known process called securitization.

Securitization - which is the conversion of mutual fund shares sold loans on the secondary market - provides the means to exert leverage on the massive debts. The banks use off-balance sheet transactions to create titles in order to avoid the normal obligations of discretion and control operations disturbing. As bizarre as it sounds, loan quality is not taken into account, since banks make their money on building loans and other fees. What matters is quantity, quantity and quantity; an assembly line of industrial size loan nauseating dumped on unsuspecting investors to fatten the results. And, damn, how easy it is for Wall Street to rake with a vengeance this rotten paper when no one is to monitor and that the Fed plays with cheerleaders in the stands! In an analysis by economist Gary Gorton, prepared for the 2009 conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta in the financial markets and called "Slapped by the Invisible Hand, the Banking Sector and the Panic of 2007" [" Slapped in the Face by the Invisible Hand, Banking and the Panic of 2007 "], the author shows that mortgage-related securities have really swollen from 492.6 billion dollars in 1996 to 3,071.1 billion dollars in 2006. In all, more than 20 trillion [1 trillion = 1000 billion] worth of securitized debt were sold between 1997 and 2007. How much of this debt will prove worthless as and as foreclosures skyrocket and banks' balance sheets will be increasingly under pressure? Read the rest of this article ... "

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

by Thierry Brugvin (sociology professor)

Introduction

manipulation For over twenty years, globalization alienates citizens from decision-making centers. French citizens observe with the European Union while at the international level, the G8 imposes its political model in the world, through the IMF, World Bank and WTO in particular. Within these different organizations, under a discourse on "good governance", the Liberal leaders privatizing democratic bodies in fostering dialogue with companies over the public, their representatives, NGOs and playing the " civil society "against the United States.

These different mechanisms of governance are generally unequal and undemocratic, but remain for the most part legal. However, there is another field which is much less analyzed, it is illegal dimension of public governance. So these are different forms of political governance and economic undemocratic, unequal and as illegal as we will analyze here.

How economic forces affect does it on the decisions of public authorities, via the mechanisms of global governance illegal, unequal and undemocratic? Our hypothesis is: there is an influence, a dialectical relationship between the strength of ideas (ideas, actors and institutions), government and economic forces (institutions, actors capitalists, financial capital, the productive forces (means of production , techniques, knowledge, labor force). However economic forces exert a dominant influence over the government and the power of ideas, through global governance. However, a significant part of this national and global governance is exercised illegally, and undemocratic, even if it is not to say that all practices within the governance are illegal. It is therefore here a typology, not a comprehensive description of global governance.


Thus, we present the seven powers, or the seven forms of illegal or undemocratic governance that are fundamental obstacles to the democratization of society. This is the economic power (productive, commercial, financial banking, debt, tax havens) - The military and repressive power - National governments and international non-democratic practices and their imperialist - The power relationships (networks, lobbies ...) - The ideological power - The power-communicational The socio-psychological need for power. Read the rest of this article ... "

Tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 3 Comments »

by Albrecht Schachtschneider (Professor of Constitutional Law)

The WTO policy has made ​​possible social dumping

justice

The free movement of capital is an unfair system that not only lacks any legal basis but destroys the fundamental principles of constitutional states, democratic and liberal. The overall freedom of movement of capital deprives States of their powers, freeing the economy from its ethical obligations and inevitably leads to crises like the one we live in today. It is precisely this freedom, introduced mainly under pressure from major powers through the EU and WTO, which now seems that, following the financial crisis, all countries lack capital, becoming the cornerstone of power politics. But instead to reflect on mistakes and implement the necessary corrective measures, Germany is trying to attack small countries like Switzerland and Luxembourg, who clearly have more control over the crisis. The article explains the relationship between the financial crisis and the free movement of capital.

Part (it) legal world economic order

This is not only, nor primarily, regulation of the European Union (EU) or even the laws of its member states but the agreements of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the free movement of capital that constitute the legal framework of the global economy. The EU has become a region dependent on the world market.

The agreements of the Uruguay Round of 1994 (WTO) dramatically deregulate the global circulation of goods and services (GATT and GATS) by removing tariffs and other trade barriers as well as prohibiting discrimination between Member States. The guiding principles are that the treatment of most favored nation and that of national treatment. Thus, imports and exports do face virtually no obstacles. The majority of states are WTO members: the member countries of the European Union, China, not Russia, with which the United States are currently negotiating. The WTO is experiencing some instruments to legally protect competition, as the ADA and the subsidy agreement, which are not very effective. Of course, agricultural markets are still largely excluded from deregulation. The U.S. and the EU mainly protect their farmers and food industry against the global market, they subsidize the export of their agricultural products at the expense of less developed countries, particularly those in Africa.

Social dumping is a principle of WTO

World Trade Law no known agreements on human rights and social policy. Admittedly, the WTO members are obliged to respect the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which also includes social rights. But we can not compel the States, let alone individuals, to respect them, not even in the EU and Germany. In particular, the WTO is no known agreement to protect workers. Social dumping is virtually a principle of the WTO, probably in the interests of the competitiveness of less developed countries. So far, all attempts of the Doha Round to agree on social norms have failed. Read the rest of this article ... "

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »


Introduction

Terrible upheavals are changing our society.

The face she had, we do not ever see. Neither our children nor their children.

Some believe random things, others will believe the embezzlement, but most say it was our fault, our greatest mistake.

By the great god that sits in our living rooms, by this voice and these images, which tells us what to think, they teach us how and when to be afraid, they show us who the good and the bad.

Already the guilty are pointing finger, and fills us with resentment at these individuals, as bad faith.

Soon, before the pain of our children, we will claim revenge and blood, like many others did before.

We clouerons pilloried and we will dance and sing around their bonfire. And when we fall back on our feet, trying to regain our dignity, we understand that our society is gone and the face she had, we do not ever see.

Neither our children nor their children.

Again, if we can not think for ourselves, we are condemned to believe what we are taught.

Pierre De Chatillon - May 4, 2009 - www.incapabledesetaire.com

Article Source: The Saga of cretins (pdf)

Read more: Human society

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 5 Comments »

capitalism Attention, attention, the vast coterie occurs. The pharaohs in ties meet, great minds gather.

First, in Athens, some of the most important businessmen and politicians of the world met to hold their annual meeting with the secret Bilderberg Group , under a very tight security control. The luxurious, the Astir Palace, was protected by dozens of police officers whose mission was to keep away the press and public, reported an AFP journalist.

Then, the Sunday Times tells us that a club of millionaires in America had met to discuss their concerns about the heavy threat disastrous environmental, social and industrial. Among the concerns most important to emerge from this meeting is the overpopulation of the planet, as well as different ways to achieve the control and reduction. World depopulation. They also met in private, away from prying eyes, "to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of world population and accelerate improvements in health and education. The philanthropists who attended the summit organized by the initiative of Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, have discussed joining forces to overcome the political and religious obstacles that oppose change. "

This club named the "Good Club" by an "insider" includes David Rockefeller Jr., the patriarch of the dynasty's most wealthy in America, Warren Buffett and George Soros, financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and leaders of major media, such as Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.

But we will not be outdone. In Montreal will hold a conference from 8 to 11 June 2009 at the Hilton Montreal Bonaventure, intitullée: Adapting to a New World Order . It all happens as part of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Economic Forum of the Americas. It'll be fantastic, bring your kids and sandwiches. Among the proud sponsors of the event, there are Power Corporation of Canada Desmarais clan, Royal Bank of Canada, Rio Tinto Alcan, Genome Quebec, GDF Suez, Societe generale de financement du Quebec, Export Development Canada (EDC), VIA Rail Canada, the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC), Investissement Québec, the law firm Fraser Milner Casgrain, Deloitte, SNC Lavalin, IDRC and the CSST, the HEC Montreal, La Presse, National Post, the government Quebec and Canada as well as some international banks.

Program : Continue reading this article ... "

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 28 comments »

The incredible public confrontation between President Barack Obama and former Vice President Dick Cheney Thursday, May 22, 2009 occurred the morning revealed the fragility of constitutional government and the deep crisis of American democracy.

obama-cheney

Dick Cheney is the "Penguin" (*) of the White House (in reference to the character of the same name in Batman)

In his public speech at the National Archives in Washington, Obama accused the previous administration to violate the Constitution. That Obama's speech, devoted to the defense of its decision to close the prison camp at Guantanamo, was planned at the last minute. The objective was to thwart the attack clearly Cheney, the president was warned.

The attack came just minutes after the end of Obama's remarks. Cheney, speaking to members of a think tank on the right intelligence, denounced the president so provocative and acerbic. Mocking critics of Obama's policy of "muscular interrogation" of the Bush administration, ie torture, the former vice president has virtually accused the president of wanting to help and encourage the enemies of the United States .

Cheney is at the center of a campaign of increasingly incisive to mobilize opposition in Congress and, even more alarming among his political allies and supporters in the army and the Central Intelligence Agency, against the Obama administration. The development of the influence of the campaign was reflected by the overwhelming vote in Congress Wednesday that opposed the Obama plan to close the Guantanamo prison. The Senate, including most Democrats, supported by the testimony of FBI Director Robert Mueller III, who raised the threat posed by the potential transfer of prisoners to prisons in the United States, voted against the proposal to close Guantanamo.

In attempting to defend the policies of his administration, Obama made ​​his own decisions as a certain effort of desperate rearguard to restore constitutional government in the United States after eight years of rampant illegality on the part of the previous administration .

He emphasized the seriousness of the threat to constitutional authority, noting that he delivered his speech in a hallway that displayed the founding documents of American democracy: the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Obama reminded his audience that he had "sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution," and declared that "we must never, for expedience, turn our backs on these enduring principles."

Obama said that under the previous administration, "our government has made ​​decisions based on fear rather than foresight, and all too often our government has changed the facts and evidence to fit the ideological predispositions."

Calling for the restoration of "law and judgment in due form," Obama said that "decisions taken during the last eight years have established an ad hoc legal approach to combat terrorism was not effective and that could be supported: a framework that was not based on our legal traditions and institutions of long standing and has not been guided by our values. " Policies of the Bush administration, he said, undermined "the law".

In the most significant section of his speech, which informs us about the nature of political struggles that raged at the highest levels of government, Obama said that opponents of his policy to "adopt a perspective that can be summarized as "Anything goes". Their arguments suggest that the objective of the fight against terrorism can justify any means and that the President should have full authority to do what he wants, assuming they agree with this president. "

Using euphemisms contradicting the seriousness of his statements, Obama warned against the presence of powerful forces that were ready to break with constitutional norms, "Occasionally, he said, some believe that security and the success of the United States require that we move away from the sacred principles enshrined in this building. We can hear such voices today. " Read the rest of this article ... "

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 4 Comments »

Speed ​​up your browsing this site using:
Mozilla Firefox
The Internet browser free GMO free!